Microsoft seen not to blame for Skype rejecting open source company
Microsoft long the enemy of open source software, announces a pending deal to buy Skype and Skype promptly ditches a partnership with an open source company. Those two things have to be related, right?
Actually, probably not. While the future of Skype integration with non-Microsoft products remains to be seen, analysts say Microsoft has little if any influence over Skype until the acquisition is final, and has few good reasons to limit Skype’s ability to work with third-party products.
“The whole value of Skype is interconnectedness, and I believe they will position Skype as an intermediate, neutral, peering meeting place,” says Gartner analyst Bern Elliot.
TECH NEWS: Skype voice service crashes; users offered fix instructions
Indeed, after the $8.5 billion acquisition was announced this month, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said Skype won’t be tied solely to Windows and other Microsoft products. Skype, first released in 2003, provides Internet-based voice and video calls, and instant messaging.
Despite Ballmer’s assurance, the announcement this week that Skype will end a 3-year-old partnership to integrate its technology with Asterisk, an open source telephony system, naturally raised some concerns. Digium, the company behind Asterisk, said the product Skype for Asterisk will not be sold after July 26.
However, businesses can still use Skype Connect, a product that allows connectivity between corporate PBX systems and the Skype platform. Skype Connect integrates with Cisco, Avaya, Siemens, NEC and other big names.
Microsoft is not yet the owner of Skype. Regulatory clearances are still required before the acquisition can proceed, and Microsoft has said only that it hopes to close the deal by the end of 2011.
In terms of killing partnerships with makers of non-Microsoft products, “I don’t think [Microsoft] could take a position like that” while the acquisition is still pending, Elliot says. Elliot suspects the Skype/Asterisk move had been in the works for some time, because the decision to end a technology partnership isn’t something that happens in a knee-jerk fashion.
Even if Microsoft does have some behind-the-scenes influence on Skype’s business operations today, Skype can’t let Redmond dictate major decisions as long as it is still an independent company, says Forrester analyst Charles Golvin.
“Each of the companies has to at least keep the theoretical possibility open that, for some reason, the acquisition won’t close,” Golvin says. “They can’t do anything that would disadvantage them as an independent player going forward.”
While neither Golvin or Elliot say they believe Microsoft will intentionally limit Skype’s ability to work on non-Microsoft platforms, there are a few things for customers to worry about.
“I don’t think Microsoft will do anything to degrade that user base or discourage customers from using Skype,” Golvin says. “But we may see certain new features and capabilities that come out of Skype are available more quickly on Microsoft-based platforms.”
Comments are closed.